百文网小编为你整理了多篇好的英语演讲稿大学(大全)，希望对您的工作学习有帮助，您还可以在本站找到更多相关《好的英语演讲稿大学(大全)》范文。
第一篇：大学生英语演讲稿
The tempo of modern civilization has been much quickened in the last twenty years。 While witnessing the dramatic changes in the better-off society，people begin to reconsider the question of "survival"。 "Survival" in the old sense does not bother us anymore。 Instead，we are more concerned about how to "survive" in the human world full of petition。
Competition always carries abreast challenges and opportunities to everyone involved。 It might appear in an entrance exam，in a regular class，or in a small public speech。 Those who fail to detect its real nature-whether an opportunity or a challenge a petition really is- will lose something more or less conducive to our growth。 Of course，if we take the petition as an opportunity，we will favor it intentionally because they can help us outstand from the average; they will make us bee the focus of public attention; they will grant us more chances and rights to succeed。 As a matter of fact，opportunities are supposed to be more perceptible and weling than challenges。 The truth is，however，we will lose more opportunities when we choose to take the "opportunity" fork at the crossroads。 The other fork，ignored by us and defined as "fearful challenges"，offers much more chances for the walker in petition。
We have such an inclination in life to overestimate ourselves and hold a thoughtless attitude towards the negative outlook of things。
We believe in the old saying，"Opportunity knocks but just once，" so we always wele it and devote all our spirit and efforts to it。 The most devout believer of this saying are the graduates。 Why? There are quite a number of them who pay full attention to positions in big cities and are willing to flood into developed areas under any circumstances，even though there will be too much uncertainty for their choices。 Innumerable cases go straight to the same miserable end: God seems to refuse to help too many of His worshipers。
In conclusion，to define the quuality of petition seems to be far from valuable sense，for no matter what a petition is，an opportunity or a challenge，it will create nutritious elements for our growth。
So take a positive look at everything around。 Keep our face to the sunshine，and we will not see the shadows。
现代礼貌的速度已经大大加快，在过去二十年。虽然目睹了小康社会的.急剧变化，人们开始重新研究“生存”的问题。在老意义上的“生存”不打扰我们了。相反，我们更关心的是在人类世界充满了竞争如何“生存”。
比赛总是带有并进的挑战和机遇，每个人都参与。它可能会出此刻入学考试，在普通班，或在一个小公开演讲。这些谁无法检测它的真实性质，无论是机会还是挑战，竞争真的是-将失去更多的东西还是少，有利于我们的成长。当然，如果我们以竞赛为契机，我们将有利于它故意，因为他们能够帮忙我们outstand从平均水平;他们将让我们成为公众关注的焦点;他们会给予我们更多的机会和权利，以取得成功。由于事实上，机会应当是更多的感知和热情大于挑战。事实是，可是，我们将失去更多的机会，当我们选择采取了“机会”叉处于十字路口。其他叉，被我们忽略，被定义为“可怕挑战”，供给了步行者的比赛更加的机会。
我们在生活中有这样的倾向，高估了自我，并坚持对负面展望的事情轻率的态度。
我们相信一句老话，“机会来临，但仅有一次，”所以我们随时欢迎，并全身心的精神，努力吧。这句话最虔诚的信徒都是大学毕业生。为什么?有相当多的人谁充分重视在大城市的立场，愿意涌入发达地区在任何情景下，即使将是他们的选择太多的不确定性。无数的情景下，直接进入同一个凄惨下场：上帝似乎拒绝帮忙太多他的崇拜者。
总之，要定义质量的竞争似乎是远离有价值的意义上说，不管是什么比赛是机遇还是挑战，它将为我们的成长营养元素。
所以，进取对待周围的一切。让我们的脸的阳光，我们将不会看到阴影。
第二篇：大学生英语演讲稿
Mr. Chairman, Senator Thurmond, members of the committee, my name is Anita F. Hill, and I am a professor of law at the University of Oklahoma. I was born on a farm in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, in 1956. I am the youngest of 13 children. I had my early education in Okmulgee County. My father, Albert Hill, is a farmer in that area. My mother's name is Irma Hill. She is also a farmer and a housewife.
My childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my parents. I was reared in a religious atmosphere in the Baptist faith, and I have been a member of the Antioch Baptist Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, since 1983. It is a very warm part of my life at the present time.
For my undergraduate work, I went to Oklahoma State University and graduated from there in 1977. I am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my education.
I graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the Yale Law School, where I received my JD degree in 1980. Upon graduation from law school, I became a practicing lawyer with the Washington, DC, firm of Ward, Hardraker, and Ross.
In 1981, I was introduced to now Judge Thomas by a mutual friend. Judge Thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if I would be interested in working with him. He was, in fact, appointed as Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil Rights. After he had taken that post, he asked if I would become his assistant, and I accepted that position.
In my early period there, I had two major projects. The first was an article I wrote for Judge Thomas' signature on the education of minority students. The second was the organization of a seminar on high-risk students which was abandoned because Judge Thomas transferred to the EEOC where he became the chairman of that office.
During this period at the Department of Education, my working relationship with Judge Thomas was positive. I had a good deal of responsibility and independence. I thought he respected my work and that he trusted my judgment. After approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with him.
What happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult things -- experiences of my life. It is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleepless number -- a great number of sleepless nights that I am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close friends.
I declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that I thought it would jeopardize what at the time I considered to be a very good working relationship. I had a normal social life with other men outside of the office. I believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be ill-advised. I was very uncomfortable with the idea and told him so.
I thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social suggestions. However, to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several occasions. He pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to him. These incidents took place in his office or mine. They were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone else.
My working relationship became even more strained when Judge Thomas began to use work situations to discuss sex. On these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government cafeteria. After a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual matters.
His conversations were very vivid. He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes. He talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex acts. On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess.
Because I was extremely uncomfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, I told him that I did not want to talk about these subjects. I would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his beliefs. My efforts to change the subject were rarely successful.
Throughout the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social engagements. My reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended conversations. This was difficult because at the time I was his only assistant at the Office of Education -- or Office for Civil Rights.
During the latter part of my time at the Department of Education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior ended. I began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional one.
When Judge Thomas was made chair of the EEOC, I needed to face the question of whether to go with him. I was asked to do so, and I did. The work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had ended. I also faced the realistic fact that I had no alternative job. While I might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, I was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that field. Moreover, the Department of Education itself was a dubious venture. President Reagan was seeking to abolish the entire department.
For my first months at the EEOC, where I continued to be an assistant to Judge Thomas, there were no sexual conversations or overtures. However, during the fall and winter of 1982, these began again. The comments were random and ranged from pressing me about why I didn't go out with him to remarks about my personal appearance. I remember his saying that some day I would have to tell him the real reason that I wouldn't go out with him.
推荐专题： 好的英语演讲稿大学